PAWS: Predicting Where Poachers Will Strike
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has developed Animal Recognition Software (A-RS) for wildlife managers to detect species identification. A-RS offers a tool that is easy to use, and provides the capability to perform different species identification, identification of wildlife populations and species, and the ability to analyze the effect and effect levels of the management system, based on data received. This software allows a user to detect animal species, and is useful in monitoring wildlife populations, as well as providing information to managers on the status of wildlife populations. This paper presents how the software could be used to evaluate the effect of management systems for wildlife.
Disclaimer: This article is not an endorsement of the product or service by the author or publisher; it is not an evaluation of the reliability, accuracy, or maturity of the source or any person listed as a contributor or author. The information provided here is not legal advice and the author does not claim to provide legal or professional advice.
This article is sourced from openDemocracy. OpenDemocracy. com provides free access to a variety of source material for educational and non-commercial use. Ourortality. com is providing this open source content for this educational use. If you wish to reproduce any of the source content for non-commercial purposes, please contact us and we will promptly remove it. If you find any errors or omissions in the article you can contact us by email at editing[at]openDemocracy.
This article is an excerpt from the openDemocracy.
PAWS: Predicting where poachers will strike.
The software tool PAWS, which uses software-defined radio networks to track and report on the locations of illegal wildlife trade operators and poaching activities, is showing the world that software can be part of effective new approaches to fight poachers.
In the last few years, there has been a vast expansion of the illegal wildlife trade — even across national borders in some cases — with global demand estimated at up to a quarter of a billion dollars a year. Many international conservation organizations have found it hard to keep up, so their members and partners have turned to technology like wireless mesh networks to reduce the risk of detection; satellite technology that provides real-time information to field units like search and rescue units, which can find poachers in real time; and radio frequency ID tags that send alerts, or radio beacons, if a person or animal is suspected of being involved in crime. Even satellite-borne ID tags are getting in on the action, thanks to companies like Skyhook International and other small companies, including OneNet, which provide the technology.
In the past few years, however, some in the developing world have seen a new way to fight poaching, one that focuses on technology and not physical weapons. The problem is that many of the technology companies that are able to use satellite technology for this sort of work are developing technology in languages whose meaning relies on traditional hunting methods that are still considered illegal by many people in the developing world. There is a long history of governments using technology to try to deter crimes, like in the case of the 1994 South Sudan Wildlife Convention’s ban on the use of small arms, but these have been increasingly challenged by countries that see the technology as a tool to assist them in preventing poaching, which is often the case.
Many researchers are working together on solutions, but the technology is expensive. To be effective, it needs to be simple and cheap to manufacture, and then inexpensive enough for countries to carry, like most of the world does. This is a large challenge for developing countries that might have a larger population base than the developed world and for countries that have limited domestic resources.
There is a growing international body of research on the use of satellite technology in fighting illegal wildlife trade.
PAWS: Predicting where Poachers are most likely to strike next.
The use of an alternative data model to predict where Poachers who use traditional firearms are most likely to strike. We found that non-hunters and poachers were generally less likely to carry a conventional arm in the area they usually use it in. This can be explained by a general scarcity of these weapons and a relative scarcity of the places where they are used in the areas we have measured. The non-hunters were more likely to carry guns at their usual hunting location where they normally use them in relative to where guns are normally carried.
There are many cases where poachers use firearm to kill animals and we can predict their location. However, there are also many cases where there are no poachers in the area and we can predict when poachers are likely to strike next. We use a data-driven approach to predict when an animal killer is likely to strike next using the information gathered from the last few days of poaching and hunting activity during one typical week. Since we do not know the animals in the area, we created a model that uses the most recent data and predicts the location of the next animal killer. Our prediction of when we should expect a poacher to strike was accurate and often correct with only a small percentage of false alarms. We then validated our predictions by overlaying the results on pictures taken the day that the animal killer was expected to strike. The accuracy of our predictions were very good and often correct and often outperformed the accuracy of a traditional static human sighting. We can use the information to determine where to go and not where it would be better to go, and to make a good decision on where to go. We showed that we can create an alternative data model that better predicts where poachers are likely to strike next. We expect this approach can be a useful predictor of when Poachers are likely to strike next.
Poachers are the world’s most deadly weapons of all. The world-wide total for illegal wildlife trade in 2012 was about 200 million animals killed in just the last 12 months. Poaching is a form of economic crime that is growing quickly in developing countries around the world. It is estimated that the global total value from illegal wildlife trade is in excess of 810 billion dollars.
Is technology the solution to the conservation crisis on our planet?
Abstract: This presentation will describe how I use software at work. I have noticed several things in my day to day use of software that I am not able to explain well enough for the lay person. My goal is to create an easy to understand introduction of how I use software.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room. I did not have my own computer, and my mom loaned me her old Mac computer.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room. I did not have my own computer, and my mom loaned me her old Mac computer.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room. I did not have my own computer, and my mom loaned me her old Mac computer.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room. I did not have my own computer, and my mom loaned me her old Mac computer.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room. I did not have my own computer, and my mom loaned me her old Mac computer.
My first use of software was when I was about 5 years old. I was using a mouse and a keyboard to program robots that would explore some parts of a room.
Tips of the Day in Software
The most important thing that you can do for your company is to support open software. You can’t give your customer something for free and expect them to keep using it. We’ve always said that to be a good open-source company you have to support open open-source software, and you can’t just say “we support open source” and expect it to work. If you’re going to make software available to the world, you have to make sure you make your software support the open-source community you support.
But to back up that claim, we thought we’d look at what open-source software is used for and how that has changed over time. This post is not about what open-source is, but rather what open-source software is used for. If you’re a developer, I suspect you’re a geeky type; you probably know this stuff.
OpenOffice is a very recent product. It was originally released in 2006. It was one of the first open office suites released and has become one of the most widely used suites in the world.
Related Posts:
Spread the loveThe United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has developed Animal Recognition Software (A-RS) for wildlife managers to detect species identification. A-RS offers a tool that is easy to use, and provides the capability to perform different species identification, identification of wildlife populations and species, and the ability to analyze the effect and effect…