Tag: purposes

Colorado River Divergence: The Long View

This is a comment on a post by John Cooney, “Colorado River Divergence: The Long View. ” There are a couple of points related to this topic of the article. John has made some good points, but for my purposes I want to start by asking for clarification from the author of the post. I…

Read More

Virus Bulletin – Huge Changes to Covid Rule Changes

| Virus Bulletin. In this article, we revisit the UK’s latest proposal to relax UK regulations for the safe handling of critical information. This proposal was brought forth in a House of Commons debate in July 2015. As the debate drew to a close, I was asked to provide comments on the document. The government’s…

Read More

The FCC Approves a New Rule for ATVA

To the Editor: Recently, the FCC proposed a new rule that would have affected all TV stations, including broadcast and cable channels, owned and operated by ATVA. The proposed rule is designed to reduce the amount that broadcasters pay for spectrum licenses. Under the proposed rule, the amount that broadcasters pay in fees for channels…

Read More

Article Title: Chinese Court Declares That Huawei Logo Is Different From Under Armour

Chinese court has declared that Huawei trademark is different from that of Under Armour. Article Title: Chinese court says Huawei logo is ‘offensive’ and not in the spirit of innovation. Full Article Text: Chinese court says Huawei logo is ‘offensive’ and not in the spirit of innovation. Article Title: Judge Calls China’s ‘Stalemate’ Over Huawei’s…

Read More

Refund Delays in IRS After a Perfect Storm

“Taxes, by their nature, always are to be assessed against some property or some activity. They are not to be assessed against individuals or estates, unless there is any question about the existence of the property or the activity, or unless it is shown that the tax must be paid upon one of these units.…

Read More

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s Decision

The Circuit court of appeals found that a digital camera can be an “information” device in certain circumstances, and found that the patent-in-suit was invalid because it did not meet the “information” requirement of 35 U. “Information” is an important term in the patent law. Although the patent in suit failed to meet the minimum…

Read More