Senators, Staff and Other Advocates Issue a Letter urging Senate Leadership to Invest in Lab Infrastructure

Senators, Staff and Other Advocates Issue a Letter urging Senate Leadership to Invest in Lab Infrastructure

Spread the love

A collection of Senators, staff and other advocates have issued a letter urging Senate leadership to invest in the security of lab infrastructure to provide the “expert’s ability to detect and contain cyber threats. ” The letter was signed by more than a dozen senators, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Rules Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Jeff Sessions, as well as members of Obama’s Cyber Security Task Force. Senators also joined with fellow Senate Democrats, as well as members of the Obama Administration, in urging Senate leadership to invest in lab infrastructure as a way of addressing potential vulnerabilities and cyberattacks. The letter came as part of a coordinated effort by the Senate Intelligence Committee to encourage the Administration to work with Senators to create a Senate-level cybersecurity strategy, including a cybersecurity policy. The letter is addressed to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Menendez and is also addressed to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and National Security Adviser Susan Rice. Senators and staff members also joined in the letter on Twitter.

Thank you Senator Menendez for your leadership and your continued commitment to our cybersecurity.

On Friday, we were privileged to meet with a group of Senator Reid’s team. We also met with Senator Leahy and some of our staff including members of his Senate Caucus. Over the course of the day, Senator Leahy spent significant time with all of us, giving us his perspective on how to move forward.

It is clear from his remarks that Senator Leahy is a well-respected member of the Senate. He is one of the most respected and experienced legislative leaders in the Senate and we are proud to have him serve as Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman.

We also appreciate Senator Leahy’s candor and willingness to speak freely about his views on the issue of cybersecurity.

It is encouraging to note that Senator Leahy is aware of the Department of State’s Cyber Security Mission, which he has previously mentioned as being one of the top 10 priorities.

Senator Leahy is also very aware of the important work of the Senate’s Homeland Security Committee that focuses on cyber.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Ben Ray Luján and the Department of Energy National Laboratories

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, a key committee in the United States government. As such, she has long been involved in the development of nuclear energy, but her recent actions on security have been criticized. In the following statement, Senator Feinstein and the Department of Energy National Laboratories (DOE NLS) are being criticized for their recent actions in the field of national security.

(C)The Department of Energy’s National Laboratories. The Department of Energy (DOE) was created by the Energy Bill of 1978 and was renamed the Department of Energy (DOE) in 1981. The DOE has the responsibility for national laboratories and is under the jurisdiction of Secretary of Energy Frank N.

(D)Ben Ray Luján (D-NM). Senator Luján has served as a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee since 2011. Senator Luján has been recognized by the Department of Energy for his role in the development of nuclear energy as the co-lead author of the Nuclear Energy Cross-Section Working Group legislation. Senator Luján has become a leading critic of the DOE NLS Nuclear Science and Critical Technology program, and has worked with Senator Feinstein to help bring security standards for nuclear technology to the federal level. Senator Lujan has also been a leader in the debate on the Federal Register for Nuclear Security in the past. Senator Lujan currently serves as the Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Senator Lujan was appointed to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in December 2013. The full text of Senator Lujan’s statement is provided below.

This week the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee (Energy & Natural Resources) held one of its first hearings on national security and nuclear security. The hearing was titled, “Nuclear Security, Security at the State Level, and Protecting Our National Security Nuclear Threats. ” The focus of this hearing was not science or technology but national security. Our focus is on national security and nuclear security.

The hearing lasted about one and a half hours. It was very well-attended. There were a number of speakers, as well as the Chairman.

Schumer and McConnell, Majority Leader : funding national lab infrastructure -

Schumer and McConnell, Majority Leader : funding national lab infrastructure –

A Senate bill that could force the elimination of two federal agencies and the expansion of the National Science Foundation budget has emerged in committee with bipartisan support and at least a hint of hope that it will gain traction this fall, despite opposition by the House. After weeks of bickering, committees agreed on language that would require the National Science Foundation (NSF) to set aside a fraction of its annual budget to fund the research and education programs of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, to help defray the costs of new equipment that would be needed to conduct experiments and conduct training for the next generation of scientists. But Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) has promised to hold up consideration of the bill unless it has a chance to win over the House. Grassley and Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt. ) are continuing their negotiations, meeting Wednesday morning with senators from both parties.

“If you want to have a chance to get something done, you should push for an amendment,” said Sen. Leahy (D-Vt. “To say that you’re not going to do anything, to not have a bill, you should have an amendment.

Grassley and Leahy’s negotiations began on Tuesday, when Grassley and Leahy convened an impromptu conference call in the Capitol office of Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R. ), a member of the subcommittee overseeing the NIH. Over the weekend, Leahy told Grassley he was willing to try to get language that would allow the NIH to redirect $500 million in the new budget to the NSF and for the $150 million provided by the NIH specifically for the NSF to be used to build the new National Biomedical Research Infrastructure Program (NBIRP), an initiative aimed at building a new national lab in every state to develop new technologies and create jobs. A similar proposal was included as an amendment in the original NIH-NSF funding bill but was dropped.

“The NIH can use the funds for infrastructure,” Grassley said. “I’ve sent an amendment.

Accelerating National Laboratories Infrastructure Investment

Accelerating National Laboratories Infrastructure Investment

In the last few years, there has been an acceleration in investment in science, technology and innovation (STI) in countries globally – and in countries around the world – as shown by the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Global Trends in Science, Technology and Innovation 2013 (GTTI 2013).

The GCC countries are leading the way in innovation in science, technology and innovation (STI) with investment in innovation exceeding $10 billion in 2013 while the USA, Japan and Singapore are among the top five, investing $4 billion, $4. 4 billion and $3. 3 billion in 2013 respectively.

Despite the increasing demand for science and technology, countries’ science and technology investment levels have failed to keep up with the increase in investment in STI and have been stagnant.

The GTCI 2013 has identified the key areas in which investment needs to increase to meet the increasing demand for science, technology and innovation (STI). The GCC countries are leading the way in this initiative and are leading the way in innovation, both with and without STI.

* A robust scientific research, innovation, and development system through a well-functioning administrative framework and effective policies and incentives for innovation.

* Strengthening the public-private partnerships to reduce barriers to access and innovation.

* The availability of strong research and innovation infrastructures through strong public research institutes and a robust research capability to catalyze new ideas and new technologies.

* The development of a skilled workforce, both technically and administratively, through an effective skilled education system, and a skilled workforce in the innovation infrastructure.

* The strengthening of the public-private partnership and research and innovation infrastructures through a strengthened public research institute.

* A strong business environment, including a business environment to develop and support innovation.

Tips of the Day in Network Security

What should I do if I think I’ve missed a critical vulnerability in one of my websites? What should I do if I’m using a vulnerable version of a software product that I may have installed from a vendor that has not updated the software? These questions may seem like too much to think about for the average internet user but they’re not so daunting for systems administrators. This site has written plenty of articles on what to do if you think you’ve found a vulnerability but haven’t been able to fix it.

The bad news is that you won’t get anywhere unless you’re the right kind of person. To do any good reading on this website you have to be a qualified system administrator. So if you’re not sure what that means I’m glad you’re reading this. The important thing is you must do whatever it takes to fix the issue so you can report it and not leave it unpatched and open to future attack.

The first step is to identify every vulnerability you find. The easiest way is to just type the name into a text editor and search for it.

Spread the love

Spread the loveA collection of Senators, staff and other advocates have issued a letter urging Senate leadership to invest in the security of lab infrastructure to provide the “expert’s ability to detect and contain cyber threats. ” The letter was signed by more than a dozen senators, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Rules…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *