Kanu Disobedience in Computer Security
This article is an attempt at a concise explanation of a phenomenon known as Kanu Disobedience. Kanu means ‘obedient’, and as we show in this article, a Kanu who is not only disobedient but also disloyal is known as a Kanu disobedient. The phrase “disobedient” is usually used in reference to something that is unwilling to do what is asked of it or that is unwilling to conform to other people’s ideas or needs. Disobedience is the basic characteristic of an obedient or loyal person and so Kanu disobedience refers to the concept of a person who does not conform to the beliefs and preferences of others. In this article, we shall review how the concept of Kanu disobedience came about and how the phenomenon of Kanu disobedience is described in the history of computer security. We shall also examine some of the possible reasons Kanu disobedience is considered to be a real security problem.
In a computer network, the security of a computer network depends primarily on the presence and quality of software being developed for that network. Many companies, especially large Internet based companies, have begun to take their own software development processes into account and to base the security of their products on software engineering instead of the traditional manual process of testing, writing, compiling, and debugging. This shift in attitude has been attributed to the success of the Internet and the ease of accessing software that can be downloaded from an Internet based source to a software developer’s computer.
In the corporate world, Kanu disobedience is often seen in the context of a company’s failure to deliver a product with a quality standard. This is often due to the company’s attitude of not taking the technology as it is developed and believing that the technology is ‘out there’, while in fact it is ‘in their hands’ or ‘available to them’.
The leader of the Biafra indigenous people Nnamdi Okwu Kanu
A recent Biafran man has been reported to have shot and killed a policeman on a routine patrol operation, it is reported. The police officers were on routine duty in the Northern Region town of Olo-Odiba when an unidentified Biafrans man opened fire on the patrolling car with a Kalashnikov. He was immediately shot and killed by the police officer. One of the policemen was also seriously stabbed and several of them were injured in the incident. In the following investigation, the police officers were charged with murder because it was believed there was a possibility that the killer may be a member of another indigenous group. At the time of the incident, the police officer was on duty with his car in the city and had not been given any kind of special permission to accompany his duty. The local Biafran government has denied the allegations and has also said that the officer was on his way to arrest a suspected thief. The Police Commander of the Northern Region Police command, Mr. Ephraim Kano was shocked by the events and called a meeting of the Biafra National Congress to discuss the shooting incident. The Biafra National Congress said that the incident did not warrant a complete investigation. “The Biafran Police Command is responsible for all the policing activities and this incident has not been dealt with in the Biafran Police Command,” he said. Kano called on the people of Biafra to unite, not to support the Biafra government and to give the Police the space they need to do their job. The Biafra leader, Mr. Nnamdi Okwu Kanu, was also shocked by the murder of the police officer. He said the incident showed that, as in other parts of the country, the people of Biafra are not on the path to independence. “I was shocked by the killing of the patrol officer, not because he was the policeman’s friend but because the people of Biafra are not on the path to independence,” he said. “The incident shows that as Biafra citizens, we need to unite to fight to make our country independent,” he added.
Pro-Biafra and Pro-Biafra protests in Onitsha, Abia State.
Article Title: Pro-Biafra and Pro-Biafra protests in Onitsha, Abia State | Network Security.
Protestors, on 14 January, 2017, threw stones at the State House in Onitsha, the capital of Abia State, over the passage of controversial Bill No. 19, which makes provision for the allocation of land under the Abia State Land Commission Act. The protests were over the appointment of former Governor of Abia State, Dr. Rochas Okorocha to chair the State Land Commission.
After the passage of Bill No. 19, protesters threw stones and also burnt tyres at the gates of the State House. Police quickly restored order and no further stones were thrown on the State House. No injuries to anyone were reported and the gates of the State House were again locked, to ensure security.
Protestors, on 14 January, 2017, threw stones at the State House in Onitsha, the capital of Abia State, over the passage of controversial Bill No. 19, which makes provision for the allocation of land under the Abia State Land Commission Act. The protests were over the appointment of former Governor of Abia State, Dr. Rochas Okorocha to chair the State Land Commission.
After the passage of Bill No. 19, protesters threw stones and also burnt tyres at the gates of the State House. Police quickly restored order and no further stones were thrown on the State House. No injuries to anyone were reported and the gates of the State House were again locked, to ensure security.
Abia State (March 11, 2017) – A crowd of some 20,000 Abia State people, who had gathered in the capital of Abia State to demand an end to the appointment of the Governor of Abia State, Rochas Okorocha to chair the land commission in Abia State, in a large demonstration to mark the end of the third day of the ongoing protest on the same issue, threw stones at the State House in Onitsha on 14 January 2017.
The governor, who was the chief guest to a state day celebration at the office of the State Land Commission chairperson, Rochas Okorocha, decided to make a public remark that the commission was an independent body, free of political influence and not a mere extension of the State House, as some alleged.
On the death of Nnamdi Kanu,
Security researcher Zohar Gomaa discovered a flaw in Nnamdi Kanu’s VPN configuration which allowed remote attackers to steal sensitive information from the systems being protected.
Researchers at VyprVPN discovered flaws in Nnamdi Kanu’s VPN configurations when attempting to connect to the VPN in question. The researchers are not aware of the vulnerabilities that were exploited by the attackers.
The research team’s findings are available online. The study also contains links for further reading on the subject.
In January 2006, Nnamdi Kanu discovered a flaw in his VPN’s configuration allowing the attackers to control the traffic being sent to his client machines.
Kanu had found a flaw earlier in the same year in February in his configuration for his Internet Gateway (IG) appliance, and his colleagues had already discovered a flaw in his configuration for the same device in December.
His research on both IG and his VPN was focused on using the VPN for the purpose of being able to provide secure connections to remote users who are not part of his company’s infrastructure and who were not involved in the initial setup.
The researchers believe that the flaw that was found in both VPNs is used by attackers to carry out remote remote access attacks. The researchers believe that this is why they used the words “remote access,” rather than saying “attack,” in their title since it would have been easier to describe the flaw as an actual attack against the victim’s local network or computer, rather than against the VPN.
The same flaw affects all the clients in the VPN, meaning that the attackers can use any configuration they like to access the remote systems through that VPN.
The researchers also believe that the flaw affects both the IGP and the VPN clients.
In December, the research team’s first report on the same subject had already been published, and they had also started to publish research on the subject that they had published in January of this year.
According to the researchers, the flaw has a small, but significant impact on the security of the Internet. The researchers believe that if the flaw is not closed by the time the attackers are ready to carry out a successful attack, their ability to access the Internet will be compromised.
Related Posts:
Spread the loveThis article is an attempt at a concise explanation of a phenomenon known as Kanu Disobedience. Kanu means ‘obedient’, and as we show in this article, a Kanu who is not only disobedient but also disloyal is known as a Kanu disobedient. The phrase “disobedient” is usually used in reference to something that…