APTS Applauds House Subcommittee on Communications Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Association of Professional Television Serials Directors (APTS) has issued an official Press Release applauding House Subcommittee on Communications (HCS) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her efforts to increase public television’s “investment in programming excellence. ” APTS also congratulates the Association for Professional Television for providing a positive endorsement of the resolution.
According to the APTS’s press release, HCS, led by Wasserman Schultz, took up the issue again this past February. The bill (the Public TV Enhancement Act in House Bill 1447[ ]) sponsored by Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn. ) proposes to add public television to the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and to increase the financial investment in public television by at least $500 million over three years. APTS would like to see additional resources provided to public television on a national level.
The APTS is also pleased that the Association of Professional Television Serials Directors (APTS) has endorsed the House bill. APTS is the umbrella organization for professional television serials directors throughout the world. The APTS is the nonprofit organization that manages the Professional Television Serials Directory (www. org) and works to promote public television and its programming to the professional television industry. APTS also publishes the Journal of Television Science (www.
APTS is urging the House to support and pass the Public TV Enhancement Act, which the APTS has described as a “reasonable and practical way to increase funding for public television.
“The need for public television is critical and the funding is increasing,” said APTS President Michael Reisman. “So we are very pleased to be able to officially share our support in this matter.
While noting that public television is a very important aspect of the public broadcasting system, APTS feels that it is necessary to make public television more affordable in view of the fact that the programs are broadcast over the Internet.
“We have to balance that with the need to maintain an adequate number of public television channels to reach audiences throughout the country,” said APTS President Michael Reisman.
The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies recommended $565 million in advance funding for public broadcasting in fiscal year 2024.
Article Title: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies recommended $565 million in advance funding for public broadcasting in fiscal year 2024 | Programming.
The full Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies (HHS) recently issued an appropriations request to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for the fiscal year of 2024. The request requested $2,099,902 in capital expenses for broadcasting, including $20,828,000 to be used for stations that will increase their programming under the Next Gen Act, and an additional $1,842,000 in “station capital expenses” for stations that are transitioning to the Next Gen platform. The Subcommittee also requested an additional $5,500,000 for research grants for the American Society for Clinical Radiology, and in-kind awards totaling $5,000,000 to nonprofit academic medical centers. The full document is available here.
In its recommendation, Congress, through the Subcommittee, asks the FCC to consider funding a number of activities for public broadcasting, all of which are described in the document. As of June 30, the FCC has not yet responded to the Subcommittee’s request or proposed actions.
Congress, through the Subcommittee, finds that public broadcasting serves the citizens of the United States by providing a public resource that is essential to society, promotes educational excellence and serves as an important platform to disseminate important and timely scientific information.
The Subcommittee finds that the FCC has determined that, at least in the short to medium term, public broadcasting will become an essential resource of the nation, and that public broadcasting is best positioned to become a focal point for scientific innovation. The FCC proposes that the Agency support and invest in public broadcasting stations that are responsive to the needs of the American people while promoting innovative and technologically sound programming. The FCC believes that public broadcasting stations will continue to play an important role in disseminating scientifically accurate information while helping to foster greater public awareness of important topics.
The Subcommittee recommends that the Commission consider allocating funds for public broadcasting stations that are responsive to the needs of the American people and promote innovative and technologically sound programming.
The American public television stations
This brief article by the Department of Homeland Security on the public television stations in the United States is based on a study of four television stations that are part of the network that is owned by the U. Government: The New York City-based public television station WNET (Channel 7) receives some government funds, as do three other local stations: WNET Boston (Channel 7), WNET West Virginia (Channel 7), and WNET Kansas City (Channel 7). The other two stations are locally owned.
The New American Media Studies Program is a collaboration among the departments of communications, media, and history at the University of California, Los Angeles.
This brief article, by the Department of Homeland Security, examines the programs that these four broadcast stations offer that the U. Government uses.
What are the types of programming produced by each of the agencies that the Government uses? The specific programing is listed here.
What is the relationship between the types of content produced by each of the agencies? This is an important issue because, as the Government states, the intent of the programs is that it be presented by the agencies as a whole.
The answer to the first of these questions is “not very much. ” Most of the information is of the type that makes it hard for us to tell whether the programming is intended as a whole, or is an expression of the agencies’ particular interests. In many cases, the programming produced is similar to other types of content produced by the agencies that they work with. The programs that Government uses are either so infrequent that we are unable to trace the intent of the programs, or so often that we have no reliable way of determining if the programming is intended as a whole.
Government uses: a comparison of the four broadcast programs that is not exhaustive.
There are several ways in which Government uses different types of programming.
WNET: Government uses most of the output of WNET. The output of WNET includes local news, talk shows, dramas, newsreels, feature films, documentaries, sports, advertising, music, education, and other programs, all of which can be viewed on WNET’s local stations, as well as a variety of other government-related web sites.
Stacey Karp
In this interview, Stacey Karp talks about her research on the use of Python with embedded systems.
Stacey Karp: Python, like many open source projects, is a product of its environment, not a “programming language”, as it were. The “language” is its compiler, which is a large part of the Python development process. The compiler transforms source code in a programming language — in this case, Python, but not only Python. To create the final program, you have to run the compiler on the code, interpret it, execute the interpreter, and compile it into machine executable code — just like the computer does. So the “language” does not represent how the computer looks or how it runs.
Stacey Karp: A lot of the software being developed for embedded systems — even products like the Arduino Uno — is written in C language. The C programming language is a pretty good language for creating simple code that allows you program a basic device. But the fact that embedded systems are designed to be a fairly low level piece of hardware is forcing engineers to choose less-powerful languages to work and maintain this kind of functionality.
Stacey Karp: Not at all! A lot of the core C code is written by the embedded systems team myself, and it’s all written in C now. It’s not always the most efficient way of doing things, but it’s generally good enough. If you have to, C can be replaced by a more efficient language.
Stacey Karp: Not really. C has all the tools that people use for writing software — it’s the “language” — but it also has all the tools that people use for programming languages.
Tips of the Day in Programming
How to Create a Queue in Python 2.
In Part 1 of this series I asked about the differences between Python and C++ and what the advantages are of using one over the other. In this second part I’ll look at some general features on how to create a “C” queue in Python. The first part of this series contained some C examples and now I’d like to focus on Python 2. The queue I’ll be using is a simple queue implementation written in C++ that I wrote. Nowadays many projects use Python to build something similar to what I’m doing with the C++’s “queue”.
The Queue class is where the features of Python come together to create Python’s queue. In this first part I’m focusing on creating a queue in Python 2. 6 and this is because I think this is actually an important topic to learn about. We are going to create a mutable queue that holds two objects.
Related Posts:
Spread the loveThe Association of Professional Television Serials Directors (APTS) has issued an official Press Release applauding House Subcommittee on Communications (HCS) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her efforts to increase public television’s “investment in programming excellence. ” APTS also congratulates the Association for Professional Television for providing a positive endorsement of the resolution. According…