HSE Cyber-Attack on Cork University Hospital
We review the events that transpired during a HSE cyberattack on a Cork hospital’s internal network. The attack led to the theft of over $300,000 in hospital accounts and the closure of a number of hospitals within the HSE region. We discuss the cybercrime techniques used and the effects it has had on HSE regional operations. The HSE is a regional body responsible for managing and delivering healthcare in the region (Health Service Executive).
The events in April 2012 that led to the closure of the Cork University Hospital were described by the Health Service Executive as a cyber incident. The health service executive’s response was rapid and effective. The HSE was able to recover all of the funds stolen from the hospital’s patient data, the patients were restored to their previous positions and the hospital was closed. The HSE has since been able to recover the funds and they are working to get the remaining funds back to patients. However, there were a number of issues which remained in the incident response. We discuss a number of issues relating to HSE response and prevention.
The HSE has long been aware of the danger posed by cyberattacks and the risk of cybercrime impacting not only a hospital but other health service providers in the region. The Department of Health provided cyber security training to health service providers in 2012. The department also published guidance on cybersecurity for all institutions in the department of health and the Irish health services. It is intended that, as part of these procedures, all health service providers be provided with a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the nature of cyber-attacks on their systems and the actions necessary to secure them.
The problem of cybercrime on health services is not new however. It has been evident for some time that health services in Ireland are at risk from cyber attacks. There has been a major increase in the number of cyberattacks against health service providers during 2012, with two major incidents. The first incident, HSE Cyber-Attack on ICS, was an attack on internal systems of the Cork University Hospital. The attack followed a routine security assessment by the HSE which has become a routine event for hospitals in the HSE region. This incident highlighted the need to improve security on health data in the region. The second incident was an HSE Cyber-Attack on Health.
Army. to Cork University Hospital, following the cyber attack on May 14.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
January 8, 2013 (Coventry) — The University Hospitals Coventry campus was heavily affected by a cyber-attack on Friday, May 14, 2013 that saw a remote host compromise the university’s online database, leading to the disclosure of confidential patient data.
A report by the University of Worcester’s Information Security Centre (ISC) states that the database was accessed using a command-and-control (C2) account (created by the attacker) running under the name Edward Lee, a ‘hacker’ in the hacking group ‘Guardians of Peace’.
In response, the university has established a new C2 service (e-mail account registered to Edward Lee) and a new password that matches the username, with the intention that other student staff/employees will not have access to the e-tables as a result of this incident.
The report states: “It is the intention that all staff should be aware of the new password as this may raise issues for staff and students in the future.
Two staff members confirmed that they have been using the new passwords, but none admitted to having been using them recently, and no further information was provided.
The university is committed to supporting those affected by the incident and has launched three initiatives to assist affected students and staff.
The university’s Information Security Centre has produced a report of the incident which is available here.
The University Hospitals Coventry campus has been heavily affected, with one incident in which a hacker gained access to a patient’s electronic medical records.
This caused the hospital to stop processing new patients, leading to hospital staff members being at risk of attack.
The attack was a result of a vulnerability in the hospital’s computer, which was being exploited by an ‘unknown attacker.
Operational system cleaning and restoration at the HSE
Operational system cleaning and restoration at the HSE.
In the past twenty-five years, the Office of the National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) of the United States has conducted a series of national drug control education and prevention campaigns. These campaigns have been conducted in different parts of the United States, and they address a wide range of issues, such as drug abuse detection, drug abuse treatment, drug abuse prevention, and drug abuse education.
The first campaign, the National Drug Control School (NDCS) campaign, which began in 1997, aimed to raise awareness on drug use among the general public and, as a result, contributed to a growing number of people who were at high risk of drug use. The second campaign, the national drug abuse education campaign (NDEA), was conducted in 2002, and raised awareness about drug abuse among the general public. A series of NDEA campaigns were conducted in 2003 and 2004. These campaigns focused on preventing drug abuse among the general public by educating people about the risks associated with drug use. And a third campaign, the National Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment (NDEPAT) campaign, was conducted in 2006, which was an important step in the fight against drug abuse.
The National Drug Control Schools (NDCS) campaign was used for two main reasons. First, the campaign was a response to the National Institutes of Health’s 1998 report, “Training and Education for Drug Abuse Prevention in the Schools. ” The report, entitled, “Training and Education for Drug Abuse Prevention in the Schools,” was a report commissioned to the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), which was established by the United States Congress in 1996 to study the causes of drug abuse. The report called for the United States government to put efforts into developing drug prevention programs that would be implemented in schools nationwide. Second, the campaign was an effort to publicize a campaign that was being conducted in the United States. This campaign, the NDEA, was conducted between 1999 and the 2010, and focused on drug abuse prevention by educating the general public about drug abuse. A series of NDEA campaigns were conducted in 2003 and 2004, and focused on drugs that cause problems such as methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin.
The Irish Cyber Security Commission (NCSC)
The Irish Cyber Security Commission began on 27th March 2013 and has officially commenced. It was established by the Irish Government in connection with the establishment of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) which is designed to provide a forum and a strategy for the co-ordination of the activities of security services in relation to digital threats. The role of the Commission is to contribute to setting priorities for the co-ordination of activities of security services, and to undertake research into the issues surrounding the prevention of attacks, exploitation, denial of service, misuse and abuse of information, and related issues.
As we are aware, the Commission is now taking the lead on cyber security issues from the UK Government.
In the case of the UK, the Commissioners’ papers come under the heading of ‘Information Systems Security: Defences and Defences. ’ The main conclusion of the papers is that the lack of a single national information security framework may create more risks to digital systems in the UK than for instance in the US. Another conclusion is that the UK, in the absence of a well defined information security framework, may need to develop regional or even international information security frameworks in a manner which is compatible with the EU’s information security framework. The paper indicates that the UK is making steps in this respect, but that the EU is taking more advanced steps. The paper also considers the possibility of the creation of a Commission for Information Systems Security.
The Commission’s initial task is to review in detail the ways in which the UK has taken steps in this respect and consider the possibility of establishing a Commission for Information Systems Security. The final objective of the Commission is to develop and develop the cyber security legislation and relevant guidance, taking into account the EU cyber security framework and the development of the UK cyber security strategy.
Tips of the Day in Computer Security
The recent FBI investigation on the so-called “hacker” group Fancy Bear, revealed that the group had targeted a number of government contractors with identity theft protection requests and had taken significant monetary proceeds from these victims. The FBI also published the results of a cybercrime screen called “Top 20 Most Hacked Companies” in its report of January 12, 2016, which showed that the group had attacked at least 27 companies.
The company that was attacked was Symantec as shown in the following infographic.
Symantec was the subject of some press in the past, but most of that was based on the initial findings of the FBI investigation, and the fact that some of the findings by the company were not substantiated. What was notable about the company had been a number of changes in the company’s products and approach to security, including a significant increase in the number of security patches since the end of the year.
Related Posts:
Spread the loveWe review the events that transpired during a HSE cyberattack on a Cork hospital’s internal network. The attack led to the theft of over $300,000 in hospital accounts and the closure of a number of hospitals within the HSE region. We discuss the cybercrime techniques used and the effects it has had on…